1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Holden Frontera
To start off, 2005 Holden Frontera is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2005 Holden Frontera. (202 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2005 Holden Frontera. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 375 kg more than 2005 Holden Frontera. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Holden Frontera | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | 62 | Frontera |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 3165 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2710 mm |