1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Isuzu Ascender
To start off, 2005 Isuzu Ascender is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Isuzu Ascender (275 HP) has 67 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Isuzu Ascender should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Isuzu Ascender weights approximately 9 kg more than 1964 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Isuzu Ascender | |
| Make | Cadillac | Isuzu |
| Model | 62 | Ascender |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 275 HP |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 2084 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 82 L |
