1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Jaguar X-Type
To start off, 2005 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar X-Type (228 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar X-Type should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 460 kg more than 2005 Jaguar X-Type.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Jaguar X-Type | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | 62 | X-Type |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 61 L |