1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Kia Carnival
To start off, 2005 Kia Carnival is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 2005 Kia Carnival. (142 HP @ 2000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia Carnival. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Carnival weights approximately 3 kg more than 1964 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Kia Carnival | |
Make | Cadillac | Kia |
Model | 62 | Carnival |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 2902 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 142 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 2078 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 75 L |