1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz C (268 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 535 kg more than 2005 Mercedes-Benz C.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 62 | C |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 3498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 62 L |