1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML (288 HP @ 2700 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 110 kg more than 1964 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 62 | ML |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 4966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 288 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 2140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 83 L |