1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Opel Combo
To start off, 2005 Opel Combo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 2005 Opel Combo. (74 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2005 Opel Combo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 870 kg more than 2005 Opel Combo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Opel Combo | |
Make | Cadillac | Opel |
Model | 62 | Combo |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1684 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 52 L |