1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Rover 75
To start off, 2005 Rover 75 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2005 Rover 75. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2005 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 660 kg more than 2005 Rover 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Rover 75 | |
Make | Cadillac | Rover |
Model | 62 | 75 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1796 cc |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1415 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 65 L |