1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Saturn L
To start off, 2005 Saturn L is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP) has 26 more horse power than 2005 Saturn L. (182 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2005 Saturn L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 562 kg more than 2005 Saturn L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Saturn L | |
Make | Cadillac | Saturn |
Model | 62 | L |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 182 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1468 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 59 L |