1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Toyota Echo
To start off, 2005 Toyota Echo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 2005 Toyota Echo. (108 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota Echo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1143 kg more than 2005 Toyota Echo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Toyota Echo | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | 62 | Echo |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 932 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 45 L |
