1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Toyota MR2
To start off, 2005 Toyota MR2 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2005 Toyota MR2. (150 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota MR2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1010 kg more than 2005 Toyota MR2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Toyota MR2 | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | 62 | MR2 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1792 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 48 L |