1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2005 Toyota Tundra is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Tundra (282 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 47 kg more than 2005 Toyota Tundra.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | 62 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 282 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 2028 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 100 L |