1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Ford F-250
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2006 Ford F-250. (177 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford F-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford F-250 weights approximately 826 kg more than 1964 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Ford F-250 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | F-250 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 4198 cc |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 177 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 2856 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 5760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 144 L |
