1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (149 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 781 kg more than 1964 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 2856 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 64 L |