1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Holden UTE
To start off, 2006 Holden UTE is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2006 Holden UTE. (204 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2006 Holden UTE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 530 kg more than 2006 Holden UTE. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Cadillac | Holden |
| Model | 62 | UTE |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3789 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 204 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2950 mm |
