1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 3. (105 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 955 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | 62 | 3 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 55 L |