1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Mazda 5
To start off, 2006 Mazda 5 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 5. (157 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | 62 | 5 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 60 L |