1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 955 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | 62 | 6 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 68 L |