1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz Vito
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz Vito is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 2006 Mercedes-Benz Vito. (120 HP @ 1800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mercedes-Benz Vito.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Mercedes-Benz Vito | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 62 | Vito |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2151 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 78 L |