1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer (262 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 560 kg more than 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 62 | Lancer |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 262 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 74 L |
