1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2006 Subaru Forester is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP) has 45 more horse power than 2006 Subaru Forester. (163 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2006 Subaru Forester. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 442 kg more than 2006 Subaru Forester. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Subaru Forester | |
| Make | Cadillac | Subaru |
| Model | 62 | Forester |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 2457 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | boxer |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 163 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1633 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 60 L |
