1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2006 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota 4Runner (260 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 122 kg more than 2006 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | 62 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 4670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1953 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 87 L |