1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Volvo S60
To start off, 2006 Volvo S60 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2006 Volvo S60. (206 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2006 Volvo S60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 450 kg more than 2006 Volvo S60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | 62 | S60 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 2521 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 206 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1625 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 70 L |