1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2007 Ford Ka
To start off, 2007 Ford Ka is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 2007 Ford Ka. (94 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1011 kg more than 2007 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2007 Ford Ka | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | Ka |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1019 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 3660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 40 L |
