1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2007 Mitsubishi L 200
To start off, 2007 Mitsubishi L 200 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2007 Mitsubishi L 200. (134 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2007 Mitsubishi L 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 65 kg more than 2007 Mitsubishi L 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2007 Mitsubishi L 200 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | 62 | L 200 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 2477 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 2010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 75 L |