1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2007 Volvo V70
To start off, 2007 Volvo V70 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Volvo V70 (300 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Volvo V70 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 293 kg more than 2007 Volvo V70.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2007 Volvo V70 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | 62 | V70 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 2521 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1782 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 68 L |
