1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2008 Chrysler 300 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2008 Chrysler 300. (190 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2008 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 257 kg more than 2008 Chrysler 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Chrysler 300 | |
Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
Model | 62 | 300 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 2736 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1818 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 68 L |