1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2008 Dodge Ram is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Dodge Ram (310 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 330 kg more than 2008 Dodge Ram.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Cadillac | Dodge |
| Model | 62 | Ram |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 4701 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 310 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5650 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1745 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3070 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 98 L |
