1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2008 Subaru Outback is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 600 kg more than 2008 Subaru Outback.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Cadillac | Subaru |
Model | 62 | Outback |
Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2457 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 64 L |