1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 2008 Toyota Corolla is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 950 kg more than 2008 Toyota Corolla.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Toyota Corolla | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | 62 | Corolla |
Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 60 L |