1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe (332 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 970 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | 62 | Tahoe |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 5999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 332 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 98 L |