1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Chevrolet Traverse
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse (288 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 814 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Traverse.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Chevrolet Traverse | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
| Model | 62 | Traverse |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 3599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 288 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1261 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3030 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 83 L |
