1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Fiat Linea
To start off, 2009 Fiat Linea is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 2009 Fiat Linea. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2009 Fiat Linea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 845 kg more than 2009 Fiat Linea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Fiat Linea | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | 62 | Linea |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1248 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 45 L |