1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Ford Escape
To start off, 2009 Ford Escape is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2009 Ford Escape. (171 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Escape. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1103 kg more than 2009 Ford Escape. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Ford Escape | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | Escape |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 972 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 62 L |