1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Ford F-250
To start off, 2009 Ford F-250 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford F-250 (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1109 kg more than 2009 Ford F-250.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | F-250 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 5399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 115 L |