1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP) has 55 more horse power than 2009 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Cadillac | Holden |
| Model | 62 | Epica |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 153 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2700 mm |
