1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 149 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Cadillac | Holden |
| Model | 62 | UTE |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 357 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
