1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2009 Honda CR-V is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2009 Honda CR-V. (166 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2009 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 614 kg more than 2009 Honda CR-V. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Cadillac | Honda |
Model | 62 | CR-V |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 2354 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 166 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1461 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 58 L |