1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Jaguar X-Type
To start off, 2009 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2009 Jaguar X-Type. (128 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2009 Jaguar X-Type. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 570 kg more than 2009 Jaguar X-Type. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Jaguar X-Type | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
| Model | 62 | X-Type |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1505 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 61 L |
