1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz Viano
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz Viano is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2009 Mercedes-Benz Viano. (148 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mercedes-Benz Viano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz Viano weights approximately 800 kg more than 1964 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Mercedes-Benz Viano | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 62 | Viano |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2148 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 2830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 79 L |