1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Mitsubishi Raider
To start off, 2009 Mitsubishi Raider is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mitsubishi Raider (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mitsubishi Raider should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 535 kg more than 2009 Mitsubishi Raider.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Mitsubishi Raider | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | 62 | Raider |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 3701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 83 L |