1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Acura CSX
To start off, 2010 Acura CSX is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP) has 11 more horse power than 2010 Acura CSX. (197 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2010 Acura CSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 717 kg more than 2010 Acura CSX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Acura CSX | |
| Make | Cadillac | Acura |
| Model | 62 | CSX |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1313 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4544 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1752 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1435 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2700 mm |
