1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2010 Audi TT. (158 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2010 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Audi TT | |
Make | Cadillac | Audi |
Model | 62 | TT |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2469 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 60 L |