1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Buick Lucerne
To start off, 2010 Buick Lucerne is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Buick Lucerne (227 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Buick Lucerne should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 349 kg more than 2010 Buick Lucerne.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Buick Lucerne | |
Make | Cadillac | Buick |
Model | 62 | Lucerne |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 3900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1726 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5161 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1875 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2936 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 70 L |