1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Citroen C3
To start off, 2010 Citroen C3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2010 Citroen C3. (118 HP @ 5660 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2010 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 665 kg more than 2010 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Citroen C3 | |
Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
Model | 62 | C3 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5660 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1365 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 50 L |