1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Ford Escape
To start off, 2010 Ford Escape is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Escape (265 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Escape should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 225 kg more than 2010 Ford Escape.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Ford Escape | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | Escape |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4717 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1702 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2824 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 72 L |