1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Honda Odyssey
To start off, 2010 Honda Odyssey is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Odyssey (244 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Odyssey should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Honda Odyssey weights approximately 30 kg more than 1964 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Honda Odyssey | |
| Make | Cadillac | Honda |
| Model | 62 | Odyssey |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 244 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 2105 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5133 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1958 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1778 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3000 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 79 L |
