1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Infiniti FX
To start off, 2010 Infiniti FX is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Infiniti FX (303 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Infiniti FX should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 311 kg more than 2010 Infiniti FX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Infiniti FX | |
| Make | Cadillac | Infiniti |
| Model | 62 | FX |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 303 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1719 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 90 L |
