1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XJ is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XJ (271 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 262 kg more than 2010 Jaguar XJ.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | 62 | XJ |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 271 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1813 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1895 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1456 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3157 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 82 L |