1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cadenza (269 HP) has 61 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 500 kg more than 2010 Kia Cadenza.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Kia Cadenza | |
| Make | Cadillac | Kia |
| Model | 62 | Cadenza |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 269 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4965 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1475 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2845 mm |
